But, like, imagine a Burberry shoe… but NO logo. I mean, whaaaaaat? I saw some links about the Burberry logo, vectors, PNGs, all that jazz, and it got me thinking. What would a Burberry shoe *without* the logo even *be*? Would it still scream “Burberry”?
Honestly, I’m kinda torn. Part of me thinks it’s sacrilege! Like, the logo is SUCH a big part of the brand identity. It’s what makes people go “Ooh, Burberry!” You know? It’s the visual shortcut to luxury, history, and all that aspirational stuff the first link mentioned.
But then again, maybe… just maybe… it could be kinda cool? Like, a stealth wealth kinda thing. You’d have to rely on the *quality* of the shoe, the design, the materials. It’d be more about the *feeling* of Burberry, rather than just the blatant logo flashing.
I mean, look at Neiman Marcus, they’re all about finding the logos, right? So a logo-less shoe is definitely going against the grain. But, I dunno, maybe it’s a statement? Like, “I’m so secure in my wealth, I don’t NEED the logo!” Maybe it’s a backlash against all the in-your-face branding we see everywhere these days?
Plus, think about it, Burberry has been around for ages. The SS25 collection… they got vectors and EPS files and all that, it’s crazy! So, they’ve clearly got the design chops. Maybe they could pull off something truly iconic *without* relying on the logo?
Okay, okay, I’m rambling. My point is… a logo-free Burberry shoe is a weird concept, right? It throws everything you think you know about the brand out the window. But maybe, just maybe, it could be kinda amazing. Or maybe it would just be a really expensive, well-made shoe that nobody recognizes as Burberry. Who knows! It’s all just… shoespiration, I guess.
